132

Λοκρίδες (fr. 27)

1976. 23; 180-150 BC]), which lists under the appropriate headings amounts
of money received and spent. If the words were used figuratively, it is possible
that they were applied to the ‘taking’ of Cassandra and the ‘expending’ of the
Locrian maidens.
Cronert 1903. 286 n. 4 contended from the occurrence of άνήλωμα in
papyri that Bekker was mistaken to emend to άνάλωμα and that the reason for
the Antiatticist’s entry is that the form άνάλωμα was disputed when άνήλωμα
became dominant. He did acknowledge the discrepancy, however, between
the dates of Anaxandrides and the apparent introduction of άνήλωμα (second
century BC). Inscriptions show conclusively that άνάλωμα was the only form
used in Attica until at least the second century; see Threatte 1996 11.499-501.
Moreover, Threatte 1984. 273 plausibly ascribed three of the four examples
(two of the noun, two of the wrongly augmented verb) that do occur in the
second century to orthographic errors by a single cutter. For the distinction
between λήμα and λήμμα, see Moer. λ 8 with Hansen 1998 ad loc. (cf. Pierson
1830-1831. 246); Ammon. 299 with Nickau 1966 ad loc.