Testimonia (test. 3)

43

von ,Lysippos‘5 sehr hypothetisch (vgl. etwa Olson 2007, 411: „Capps proposed
restoring Lysippus’ name above line 56 of IG II2 2325 [...]; he might be better
placed in line 70 (around 400; just after Iheopompus and Cephisodorus“; vgl.
auch Millis-Olson 2012,167: „Perhaps to be restored [Λύσιππος I-]“). Auf
der Liste folgen Pherekrates (Pher. test. 5, 437 v. Chr.), Hermippos (Hermipp.
test. 4, 435 v. Chr.), Aristophanes (Ar. test. *20, 426 v. Chr.) und Eupolis (Eup.
test. 11, 425 bzw. 424 v. Chr.). Wenn die Ergänzung stimmen sollte, dann hat
sein Dionysiensieg das J. 437 v. Chr. als terminus ante quem (vgl. Storey II331:
„around 440“).

test. 3 K.-A.
IG Urb. Rom. 216,7-9 (poetarum comicorum successus) = VI A 2,7-9 Mette
(cf. Millis-Olson 2012, 226)
— Λ]ύσιππος ένίκα μέν [ —
8 — έπ'ι Γλαυκίπ]που (a. 409) Καταχήναις [ —
— Βάκχ]αις· αύται μόναι σώι[αι —
8 suppl. Boeckh 9 Βάκχ]αις Bergk σώι[αι Körte: σώι[ζονται Boeckh

5 Capps 1906, 213: „A composite list in which the Lenaean and the City lists are
combined, on the basis of such definite dates as are available, would be something
like this: Euphronius (C. 458), Ecphantides, Cratinus (C. 452), Diopeithes (C. 451),
Crates (C. 450), Xenophilus (L. ca. 449), Telecleides (L. ca. 447), Callias (C. 446),
Aristomenes (L. ca. 445), Anonymous, Lysippus (C. ca. 435). The order by first
appearances would considerably disarrange this list“; Capps 1907,197: „On general
grounds it is safe to assert, I think, that the probable date implied by the position
proposed for Lysippus in the City list is ca. 400, in the Lenaean list ca. 414. We are
certainly justified, therefore, in looking for an earlier position for Lysippus in the
City list. In the line above Pherecrates Wilhelm (p. 110) reports traces of the lower
limbs of an α or λ followed by the lower stroke of either p, u, or φ. The position
of this stroke seems to me to favor u or, rather than p (Wilhelm suggests the
possibility of ’Άρι- here also), and, with the preceding letter, to point, as Wilhelm
observes, to Αύτ-, Άφ-, or Λυ-. A poet Autocrates, of uncertain date, is once cited
(Kock I, p. 806). There is no known poet Aph-. The restoration of Lysippus here
is the most probable on simply epigraphical grounds. Besides, he is thus restored
to the group of poets to which he properly belongs. His predecessor in IG. XIV
1097 I believe to be Callias, his successor Aristomenes, whose name is near the
head of the Lenaean list. The chronological relations of the entire list now become
intelligible and natural: Callias 446, Lysippus ca. 435, Aristophanes and Eupolis
427-424, Ameipsias 414, Cephisodotus [sic! eigentlich Kephisodoros] 402“.